The process by why subliminal stimuli act upon the unconscious mind, influencing behavior is called

1. Barutchu A., Spence C., Humphreys G.W. Multisensory enhancement elicited by unconscious visual stimuli. Exp. Brain Res. 2018;236:409–417. doi: 10.1007/s00221-017-5140-z. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

2. Kawakami N., Miura E., Nagai M. When you become a superman: Subliminal exposure to death-related stimuli enhances men’s physical force. Front. Psychol. 2018;9:221. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00221. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

3. Lourenco S.F., Ayzenberg V., Lyu J. A general magnitude system in human adults: Evidence from a subliminal priming paradigm. Cortex. 2016;81:93–103. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2016.04.013. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

4. Dehaene S., Cohen L. The unique role of the visual word form area in reading. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2011;15:254–262. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2011.04.003. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

5. Murphy S.T., Zajonc R.B. Affect, cognition, and awareness: Affective priming with optimal and suboptimal stimulus exposures. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 1993;64:723. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.64.5.723. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

6. Erdelyi M.H. Subliminal perception and its cognates: Theory, indeterminacy, and time. Conscious. Cogn. 2004;13:73–91. doi: 10.1016/S1053-8100(03)00051-5. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

7. Greenwald A.G., Draine S.C., Abrams R.L. Three cognitive markers of unconscious semantic activation. Science. 1996;273:1699–1702. doi: 10.1126/science.273.5282.1699. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

8. Saari T., Ravaja N., Laarni J., Turpeinen M., Kallinen K. Psychologically targeted persuasive advertising and product information in e-commerce; Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Electronic Commerce; Delft, The Netherlands. 25–27 October 2004; Delft, The Netherlands: ACM; 2004. pp. 245–254. [Google Scholar]

9. Ortells J.J., Kiefer M., Castillo A., Megías M., Morillas A. The semantic origin of unconscious priming: Behavioral and event-related potential evidence during category congruency priming from strongly and weakly related masked words. Cognition. 2016;146:143–157. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.09.012. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

10. Li B., Gao C., Wang W., Guo C. Processing fluency hinders subsequent recollection: An electrophysiological study. Front. Psychol. 2015;6 doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00863. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

11. Ferrand L., New B. Mental Lexicon: Some Words to Talk about Words. Nova Science Publisher; Hauppauge, NY, USA: 2003. Semantic and associative priming in the mental lexicon; pp. 25–43. [Google Scholar]

12. Bar M., Biederman I. Subliminal visual priming. Psychol. Sci. 1998;6:464–469. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00086. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

13. Bartram D. The role of visual and semantic codes in object naming. Cogn. Psychol. 1974;6:325–356. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(74)90016-4. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

14. Biederman I., Cooper E.E. Evidence for complete translational and reflectional invariance in visual object priming. Perception. 1991;20:585–593. doi: 10.1068/p200585. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

15. Becker S., Moscovitch M., Behrmann M., Joordens S. Long-term semantic priming: A computational account and empirical evidence. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 1997;23:1059. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.23.5.1059. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

16. Cave C.B. Very long-lasting priming in picture naming. Psychol. Sci. 1997;8:322–325. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00446.x. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

17. Francken J., van Gaal S., de Lange F. Immediate and long-term priming effects are independent of prime awareness. Conscious. Cogn. 2011;20:1793–1800. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2011.04.005. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

18. Yoshimoto S., Imai H., Kashino M., Takeuchi T. Pupil response and the subliminal mere exposure effect. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e90670. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090670. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

19. Kwan L.Y.Y., Yap S., Chiu C.-Y. Mere exposure affects perceived descriptive norms: Implications for personal preferences and trust. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 2015;129:48–58. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2014.12.002. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

20. Stafford T., Grimes A. Memory enhances the mere exposure effect. Psychol. Mark. 2012;29:995–1003. doi: 10.1002/mar.20581. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

21. Kopp B., Mattler U., Goertz R., Rist F. N2, p3 and the lateralized readiness potential in a nogo task involving selective response priming. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1996;99:19–27. doi: 10.1016/0921-884X(96)95617-9. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

22. Klotz W., Wolff P. The effect of a masked stimulus on the response to the masking stimulus. Psychol. Res. 1995;58:92–101. doi: 10.1007/BF00571098. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

23. Klotz W., Neumann O. Motor activation without conscious discrimination in metacontrast masking. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 1999;25:976–992. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.25.4.976. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

24. Vorberg D., Mattler U., Heinecke A., Schmidt T., Schwarzbach J. Different time courses for visual perception and action priming. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2003;100:6275–6280. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0931489100. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

25. Schmidt T., Vorberg D. Criteria for unconscious cognition: Three types of dissociation. Percept. Psychophys. 2006;68:489–504. doi: 10.3758/BF03193692. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

26. De Groot A.M. Primed lexical decision: Combined effects of the proportion of related prime-target pairs and the stimulus-onset asynchrony of prime and target. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 1984;36:253–280. doi: 10.1080/14640748408402158. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

27. Beiderman I., Cooper E.E. Size invariance in visual object priming. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 1992;18:121–133. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.18.1.121. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

28. Jolicoeur P. A size-congruency effect in memory for visual shape. Mem. Cogn. 1987;15:531–543. doi: 10.3758/BF03198388. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

29. Besner D. Visual pattern recognition: Size preprocessing reexamined. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 1983;35A:209–216. doi: 10.1080/14640748308402126. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

30. Bundesen C., Larsen A. Visual transformation of size. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 1975;1:214–220. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.1.3.214. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

31. Ellis R., Allport D.A., Humphreys G.W., Collis J. Varieties of object constancy. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 1989;41A:775–796. doi: 10.1080/14640748908402393. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

32. Jolicoeur P., Besner D. Additivity and interaction between size ratio and response category in the comparison of size-discrepant shapes. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 1987;13:478–487. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.13.3.478. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

33. Larsen A. Pattern matching: Effects of size ratio, angular difference in orientation, and familiarity. Percept. Psychophys. 1985;38:63–68. doi: 10.3758/BF03202925. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

34. Larsen A., Bundesen C. Size scaling in human pattern recognition. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 1978;4:1–20. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.4.1.1. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

35. Kosslyn S.M. Aspects of a cognitive neuroscience of mental imagery. Science. 1987;240:1621–1626. doi: 10.1126/science.3289115. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

36. Ullman S. Aligning pictorial descriptions: An approach to object recognition. Cognition. 1989;32:193–254. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(89)90036-X. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

37. Vaidya C.J., Gabrieli J.D., Monti L.A., Tinklenberg J.R., Yesavage J.A. Dissociation between two forms of conceptual priming in alzheimer’s disease. Neuropsychology. 1999;13:516. doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.13.4.516. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

38. Reisberg D. Cognition: Exploring the Science of the Mind. WW Norton; New York, NY, USA: 2007. [Google Scholar]

39. Mayr S.B., Axel B. Negative priming as a memory phenomenon: A review of 20 years of negative priming research. J. Psychol. 2007;215:35–51. doi: 10.1027/0044-3409.215.1.35. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

40. Bentin S., McCarthy G., Wood C.C. Event-related potentials, lexical decision, and semantic priming. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1985;60:343–355. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(85)90008-2. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

41. Tipper S., Driver J. Negative priming between pictures and words in a selective attention task: Evidence for semantic processing of ignored stimuli. Mem. Cogn. 1988;16:64–70. doi: 10.3758/BF03197746. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

42. Neill W.T.V., Leslie A., Terry K.M., Gorfein D.S. Persistence of negative priming: Ii. Evidence for episodic trace retrieval. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 1992;18:993–1000. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.18.5.993. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

43. Stanovich K.E.W., Richard F. On priming by a sentence context. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 1983;112:1–36. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.112.1.1. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

44. Berger J., Meredith M., Wheeler S.C. Contextual priming: Where people vote affects how they vote. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2008;105:8846–8849. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0711988105. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

45. Cook S., Fallon N., Wright H., Thomas A., Giesbrecht T., Field M., Stancak A. Pleasant and unpleasant odors influence hedonic evaluations of human faces: An event-related potential study. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2015;9:661. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00661. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

46. Cook S., Kokmotou K., Soto V., Wright H., Fallon N., Thomas A., Giesbrecht T., Field M., Stancak A. Simultaneous odour-face presentation strengthens hedonic evaluations and event-related potential responses influenced by unpleasant odour. Neurosci. Lett. 2018;672:22–27. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2018.02.032. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

47. Williams M.A., Morris A.P., McGlone F., Abbott D.F., Mattingley J.B. Amygdala responses to fearful and happy facial expressions under conditions of binocular suppression. J. Neurosci. 2004;24:2898–2904. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4977-03.2004. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

48. Fazio R.H., Olson M.A. Implicit measures in social cognition research: Their meaning and use. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2003;54:297–327. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145225. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

49. Milders M., Sahraie A., Logan S. Minimum presentation time for masked facial expression discrimination. Cogn. Emot. 2007;22:63–82. doi: 10.1080/02699930701273849. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

50. Pessoa L., Japee S., Ungerleider L.G. Visual awareness and the detection of fearful faces. Emotion. 2005;5:243–247. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.5.2.243. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

51. Potter M.C., Wyble B., Hagmann C.E., McCourt E.S. Detecting meaning in rsvp at 13 ms per picture. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 2014;76:270–279. doi: 10.3758/s13414-013-0605-z. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

52. Karremans J., Stroebe W., Claus J. Beyond vicary’s fantasies: The impact of subliminal priming and brand choice. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 2006;42:792–798. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2005.12.002. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

53. Mohan D.M., Kumar P., Mahmood F., Wong K.F., Agrawal A., Elgendi M., Shukla R., Ang N., Ching A., Dauwels J., et al. Effect of subliminal lexical priming on the subjective perception of images: A machine learning approach. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0148332. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148332. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

54. Kumar P., Mahmood F., Mohan D.M., Wong K., Agrawal A., Elgendi M., Shukla R., Dauwels J., Chan A.H. On the Effect of Subliminal Priming on Subjective Perception of Images: A Machine Learning Approach; Proceedings of the 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC); Chicago, IN, USA. 26–30 August 2014; pp. 5438–5441. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

55. Lang S.F., Nelson C.A., Collins P.F. Event-related potentials to emotional and neutral stimuli. J. Clin. Exp. Neuropsychol. 1990;12:946–958. doi: 10.1080/01688639008401033. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

56. Matsukawa J., Snodgrass J.G., Doniger G.M. Conceptual versus perceptual priming in incomplete picture identification. J. Psycholinguist. Res. 2005;34:515–540. doi: 10.1007/s10936-005-9162-5. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

57. Battig W.F.M., William E. Category norms of verbal items in 56 categories a replication and extension of the connecticut category norms. J. Exp. Psychol. 1969;80:1–46. doi: 10.1037/h0027577. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

58. Snodgrass J.G., Vanderwart M. A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Learn. Mem. 1980;6:174–215. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.6.2.174. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

59. Shelton J.R., Martin R.C. How semantic is automatic semantic priming? J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 1992;18:1191. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.18.6.1191. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

60. Perea M., Rosa E. The effects of associative and semantic priming in the lexical decision task. Psychol. Res. 2002;66:180–194. doi: 10.1007/s00426-002-0086-5. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

61. Neely J.H. Basic Processes in Reading. Routledge; London, UK: 2012. Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories; pp. 272–344. [Google Scholar]

62. Ansorge U., Klotz W. Manual and verbal responses to completely masked (unreportable) stimuli: Exploring some conditions for the metacontrast dissociation. Perception. 1998;27:1177–1189. doi: 10.1068/p271177. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

63. Ansorge U., Neumann O., Becker S.I., Kälberer H., Kruse H. Sensorimotor supremacy: Investigating conscious and unconscious vision by masked priming. Adv. Cogn. Psychol. 2007;3:257–274. doi: 10.2478/v10053-008-0029-9. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

64. Schmidt T. The finger in flight: Real-time motor control by visually masked color stimuli. Psychol. Sci. 2002;13:112–118. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00421. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

65. Schmidt T., Niehaus S., Nagel A. Primes and targets in rapid chases: Tracing sequential waves of motor activation. Behav. Neurosci. 2006;120:1005–1016. doi: 10.1037/0735-7044.120.5.1005. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

66. Schmidt T., Schmidt F. Processing of natural images is feedforward: A simple behavioral test. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 2009;71:594–606. doi: 10.3758/APP.71.3.594. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

67. Mattler U. Flanker effects on motor output and the late-level response activation hypothesis. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 2005;58A:577–601. doi: 10.1080/02724980443000089. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

68. Leuthold H., Kopp B. Mechanisms of priming by masked stimuli: Inferences from event-related brain potentials. Psychol. Sci. 1998;9:263–269. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00053. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

69. Eimer M., Schlaghecken F. Effects of masked stimuli on motor activation: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 1998;24:1737–1745. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.24.6.1737. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

70. Eimer M., Schlaghecken F. Response facilitation and inhibition in subliminal priming. Biol. Psychol. 2003;64:7–26. doi: 10.1016/S0301-0511(03)00100-5. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

71. Mattler U. Delayed flanker effects on lateralized readiness potentials. Exp. Brain Res. 2003;151:272–288. doi: 10.1007/s00221-003-1486-5. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

72. Vath N., Schmidt T. Tracing sequential waves of rapid visuomotor activation in lateralized readiness potentials. Neuroscience. 2007;145:197–208. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2006.11.044. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

73. Postman L., Keppel G. Norms of Word Association. Academic Press; New York, NY, USA: 2014. [Google Scholar]

74. Voss J.L., Schendan H.E., Paller K.A. Finding meaning in novel geometric shapes influences electrophysiological correlates of repetition and dissociates perceptual and conceptual priming. NeuroImage. 2010;49:2879–2889. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.09.012. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

75. Brown C.M., Hagoort P. In: The Cognitive Neuroscience of Language. Brown C.M., Hagoort P., editors. Volume 6 Oxford University Press; New York, NY, USA: 1999. The Neurocognition of Language. [Google Scholar]

76. Castle P.C., Van Toller S., Milligan G.J. The effect of odour priming on cortical eeg and visual erp responses. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 2000;36:123–131. doi: 10.1016/S0167-8760(99)00106-3. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

77. Watson N.V., Breedlove S.M. The Mind’s Machine: Foundations of Brain and Behavior. Sinauer Associates; Sunderland, MA, USA: 2012. [Google Scholar]

78. Gibbons H. Evaluative priming from subliminal emotional words: Insights from event-related potentials and individual differences related to anxiety. Conscious. Cogn. 2009;18:383–400. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2009.02.007. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

79. Bruner J.S., Postman L. Emotional selectivity in perception and reaction. J. Personal. 1947;16:69–77. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1947.tb01076.x. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

80. Erdelyi M.H. A new look at the new look: Perceptual defense and vigilance. Psychol. Rev. 1974;81:1–25. doi: 10.1037/h0035852. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

81. Junghöfer M., Bradley M.M., Elbert T.R., Lang P.J. Fleeting images: A new look at early emotion discrimination. Psychophysiology. 2001;38:175–178. doi: 10.1111/1469-8986.3820175. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

82. Schupp H.T., Cuthbert B.N., Bradley M.M., Cacioppo J.T., Ito T., Lang P.J. Affective picture processing; the late positive potential is modulated by motivational relevance. Psychophysiology. 2000;37:257–261. doi: 10.1111/1469-8986.3720257. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

83. Schupp H.T., Junghöfer M., Weike A.I., Hamm A.O. Emotional facilitation of sensory processing in the visual cortex. Psychol. Sci. 2003;14:7–13. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.01411. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

84. Schupp H.T., Stockburger J., Schmälzle R., Bublatzky F., Weike A.I., Hamm A.O. Visual noise effects on emotion perception: Brain potentials and stimulus identification. Neuroreport. 2008;19:167–171. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e3282f4aa42. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

85. Cuthbert B.N., Schupp H.T., Bradley M.M., Birbaumer N., Lang P.J. Brain potentials in affective picture processing: Covariation with autonomic arousal and affective report. Biol. Psychol. 2000;52:95–111. doi: 10.1016/S0301-0511(99)00044-7. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

86. Gratton G., Coles M.G.H., Sirevaag E.J., Eriksen C.W., Donchin E. Pre- and poststimulus activation of response channels: A psychophysiological analysis. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 1988;14:331–344. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.14.3.331. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

87. Dehaene S., Naccache L., LeClec’H G., Koechlin E., Müller M., Dehaene-Lambertz G., van de Moortele P.F., Le Bihan D. Imaging unconscious semantic priming. Nature. 1998;395:597–600. doi: 10.1038/26967. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

88. Sur S., Sinha V.K. Event-related potential: An overview. Ind. Psychiatry J. 2009;18:70–73. doi: 10.4103/0972-6748.57865. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

89. Chartrand T.L., van Baaren R.B., Bargh J.A. Linking automatic evaluation to mood and information processing style: Consequences for experienced affect, impression formation, and stereotyping. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 2006;135:70–77. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.135.1.70. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

90. Bodenhausen G.V.K., Geoffrey P., Süsser K. Happiness and stereotypic thinking in social judgment. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 1994;66:621–632. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.66.4.621. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

91. Park J.B., Mahzarin R. Mood and heuristics: The influence of happy and sad states on sensitivity and bias in stereotyping. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 2000;78:1005–1023. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.78.6.1005. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

92. Bernat E., Bunce S., Shevrin H. Event-related brain potentials differentiate positive and negative mood adjectives during both supraliminal and subliminal visual processing. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 2001;42:11–34. doi: 10.1016/S0167-8760(01)00133-7. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

93. Crites S.L., Jr., Cacioppo J.T., Gardner W.L., Bernston G.G. Bioelectrical echoes from evaluative categorization: II. A late positive brain potential that varies as a function of attitude registration rather than attitude report. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 1995;68:997–1013. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.68.6.997. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

94. Yee C.M., Miller G.A. Affective valence and information processing. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1987;40:300–307. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

95. Roschmann R., Wittling W. Topographic brain mapping of emotion-related hemisphere asymmetries. J. Neurosci. 1992;63:5–16. doi: 10.3109/00207459208986656. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

96. Kiefer M., Martens U. Attentional sensitization of unconscious cognition: Task sets modulate subsequent masked semantic priming. J. Exp. Psychol.-Gen. 2010;139:464–489. doi: 10.1037/a0019561. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

97. Posner M.I., Snyder C.R.R. In: Attention and Cognitive Control. Solso R.L., editor. Erlbaum; Hillsdale, NJ, USA: 1975. pp. 55–85. Information Processing and Cognition: The Loyola Symposium. [Google Scholar]

98. Schneider W., Shiffrin R.M. Controlled and automatic human information processing: 1. Detection, search, and attention. Psychol. Rev. 1977;84:1–66. [Google Scholar]

99. Van Elk M., van Schie H.T., Bekkering H. Short-term action intentions overrule long-term semantic knowledge. Cognition. 2009;111:72–83. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.12.002. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

100. Kellenbach M.L., Michie P.T. Modulation of event-related potentials by semantic priming: Effects of color-cued selective attention. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 1996;8:155–173. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1996.8.2.155. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

101. McCarthy G., Nobre A.C. Modulation of semantic processing by spatial selective attention. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1993;88:210–219. doi: 10.1016/0168-5597(93)90005-A. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

102. Rees G., Russell C., Frith C.D., Driver J. Inattentional blindness versus inattentional amnesia for fixated but ignored words. Science. 1999;286:2504–2507. doi: 10.1126/science.286.5449.2504. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

103. Henik A., Friedrich F.J., Tzelgov J., Tramer S. Capacity demands of automatic processes in semantic priming. Mem. Cogn. 1994;22:157–168. doi: 10.3758/BF03208887. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

104. Kiefer M., Martens U., Weisbrod M., Hermle L., Spitzer M. Increased unconscious semantic activation in schizophrenia patients with formal thought disorder. Schizophr. Res. 2009;114:79–83. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2009.07.024. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

105. Kiefer M. Repetition priming modulates category-related effects on event-related potentials: Further evidence for multiple cortical semantic systems. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2005;17:199–211. doi: 10.1162/0898929053124938. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

106. Deacon D., Hewitt S., Yang C.-M., Nagata M. Event-related potential indices of semantic priming using masked and unmasked words: Evidence that the n400 does not reflect a post-lexical process. Cogn. Brain Res. 2000;9:137–146. doi: 10.1016/S0926-6410(99)00050-6. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

107. Kiefer M., Brendel D. Attentional modulation of unconscious “automatic” processes: Evidence from event-related potentials in a masked priming paradigm. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2006;18:184–198. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.2.184. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

108. Ibáñez A., Manes F., Escobar J., Trujillo N., Andreucci P., Hurtado E. Gesture influences the processing of figurative language in non-native speakers: Erp evidence. Neurosci. Lett. 2010;471:48–52. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2010.01.009. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

109. Heil M., Rolke B., Pecchinenda A. Automatic semantic activation is no myth: Semantic context effects on the n400 in the letter-search task in the absence of response time effects. Psychol. Sci. 2004;15:852–857. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00766.x. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

110. Dennis T.A., Malone M.M., Chen C.C. Emotional face processing and emotion regulation in children: An erp study. Dev. Neuropsychol. 2009;34:85–102. doi: 10.1080/87565640802564887. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

111. Glenberg A.M., Kaschak M.P. Grounding language in action. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 2002;9:558–565. doi: 10.3758/BF03196313. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

112. Bush G., Luu P., Posner M.I. Cognitive and emotional influences in anterior cingulate cortex. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2000;4:215–222. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01483-2. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

113. Kutas M., Federmeier K.D. Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2000;4:463–470. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01560-6. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

114. Guerra S., Ibáñez A., Martín M., Bobes M.A., Reyes A., Mendoza R., Bravo T., Domínguez M., Sosa M.V. N400 deficits from semantic matching of pictures in probands and first-degree relatives from multiplex schizophrenia families. Brain Cogn. 2009;70:221–230. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2009.02.004. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

115. Gunter T.C., Bach P. Communicating hands: Erps elicited by meaningful symbolic hand postures. Neurosci. Lett. 2004;372:52–56. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2004.09.011. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

116. Li W., Zinbarg R.E., Boehm S.G., Paller K.A. Neural and behavioral evidence for affective priming from unconsciously perceived emotional facial expressions and the influence of trait anxiety. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2008;20:95–107. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20006. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

117. Helfinstein S.M., White L.K., Bar-Haim Y., Fox N.A. Affective primes suppress attention bias to threat in socially-anxious individuals. Behav. Res. Ther. 2008;46:799–810. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2008.03.011. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

118. Hughes G., Velmans M., De Fockert J. Unconscious priming of a no-go response. Psychophysiology. 2009;46:1258–1269. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00873.x. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

119. Yun X., Li W., Qiu J., Jou J., Wei D., Tu S., Zhang Q. Neural mechanisms of subliminal priming for traumatic episodic memory: An erp study. Neurosci. Lett. 2011;498:10–14. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2011.04.040. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

120. Lui M., Rosenfeld J.P. The application of subliminal priming in lie detection: Scenario for identification of members of a terrorist ring. Psychophysiology. 2009;46:889–903. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00810.x. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

121. Chalfoun P., Frasson C. Showing the positive influence of subliminal cues on learner’s performance and intuition: An erp study. Intell. Tutor. Syst. 2010;5:288–290. [Google Scholar]

122. Eddy M., Schmid A., Holcomb P.J. Masked repetition priming and event-related brain potentials: A new approach for tracking the time-course of object perception. Psychophysiology. 2006;43:564–568. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2006.00455.x. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

123. Holcomb P.J., Grainger J. Exploring the temporal dynamics of visual word recognition in the masked repetition priming paradigm using event-related potentials. Brain Res. 2007;1180:39–58. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.06.110. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

124. Kanske P., Kotz S.A. Concreteness in emotional words: Erp evidence from a hemifield study. Brain Res. 2007;1148:138–148. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.02.044. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

125. Aravena P., Hurtado E., Riveros R., Cardona J.F., Manes F., Ibáñez A. Applauding with closed hands: Neural signature of action-sentence compatibility effects. PLoS ONE. 2010;5:e11751. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011751. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

126. Wade N.J., Tatler B.W. Did javal measure eye movements during reading? J. Eye Mov. Res. 2009;2 [Google Scholar]

127. Rayner K., Pollatsek A. Eye movement control during reading: Evidence for direct control. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. A. 1981;33:351–373. doi: 10.1080/14640748108400798. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

128. Rayner K. Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychol. Bull. 1998;124:372–422. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.372. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

129. Yarbus A.L. Eye Movements and Vision. Plenum; New York, NY, USA: 1967. [Google Scholar]

130. Allopenna P.D., Magnuson J.S., Tanenhaus M.K. Tracking the time course of spoken word recognition using eye movements: Evidence for continuous mapping models. J. Mem. Lang. 1998;38:419–439. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1997.2558. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

131. Richardson D.C., Spivey M.J. Representation, space and hollywood squares: Looking at things that aren’t there anymore. Cognition. 2000;76:269–295. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(00)00084-6. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

132. Tanenhaus M., Spivey-Knowlton M., Eberhard K., Sedivy J. Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science. 1995;268:1632–1634. doi: 10.1126/science.7777863. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

133. Balcetis E., David D. See what you want to see: Motivational influences on visual perception. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 2006;91:612–625. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.91.4.612. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

134. Caspi A., Hirschberger G., Ein-Dor T., Zivotofsky A.Z. Looking away from death: The influence of subliminal priming on eye movement decisions. J. Vis. 2006;6:488. doi: 10.1167/6.6.488. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

135. Fromberger P., Jordan K., von Herder J., Steinkrauss H., Nemetschek R., Stolpmann G., Müller J. Initial orienting towards sexually relevant stimuli: Preliminary evidence from eye movement measures. Arch. Sex. Behav. 2012;41:1–10. doi: 10.1007/s10508-011-9816-3. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

136. Knoeferle P., Crocker M. Constituent order and semantic parallelism in online comprehension: Eye-tracking evidence from german. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. A. 2009;62:2338–2371. doi: 10.1080/17470210902790070. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

137. Knoeferle P., Crocker M.W. The influence of recent scene events on spoken comprehension: Evidence from eye movements. J. Mem. Lang. 2007;57:519–543. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.01.003. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

138. Knoeferle P., Crocker M.W. The coordinated interplay of scene, utterance, and world knowledge: Evidence from eye tracking. Cogn. Sci. 2006;30:481–529. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog0000_65. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

139. Knoeferle P., Crocker M.W., Scheepers C., Pickering M.J. The influence of the immediate visual context on incremental thematic role-assignment: Evidence from eye-movements in depicted events. Cognition. 2005;95:95–127. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.03.002. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

140. Frazier L., Munn A., Clifton C. Processing coordinate structures. J. Psycholinguist. Res. 2000;29:343–370. doi: 10.1023/A:1005156427600. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

141. Frazier L., Taft L., Roeper T., Clifton C., Ehrlich K. Parallel structure: A source of facilitation in sentence comprehension. Mem. Cogn. 1984;12:421–430. doi: 10.3758/BF03198303. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

142. Blumenfeld H.K., Marian V. Constraints on parallel activation in bilingual spoken language processing: Examining proficiency and lexical status using eye-tracking. Lang. Cogn. Process. 2007;22:633–660. doi: 10.1080/01690960601000746. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

143. Van der Stigchel S., Mulckhuyse M., Theeuwes J. Eye cannot see it: The interference of subliminal distractors on saccade metrics. Vis. Res. 2009;49:2104–2109. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2009.05.018. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

144. Mirman D., Yee E., Blumstein S.E., Magnuson J.S. Theories of spoken word recognition deficits in aphasia: Evidence from eye-tracking and computational modeling. Brain Lang. 2011;117:53–68. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2011.01.004. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

145. Nummenmaa L., Hyönä J., Calvo M.G. Eye movement assessment of selective attentional capture by emotional pictures. Emotion. 2006;6:257. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.6.2.257. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

146. Fennis B.M., Pruyn A.T.H. You are what you wear: Brand personality influences on consumer impression formation. J. Bus. Res. 2007;60:634–639. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.06.013. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

147. Fitzsimons G.M., Chartrand T.L., Fitzsimons G.J. Automatic effects of brand exposure on motivated behavior: How apple makes you “think different” J. Consum. Res. 2008;35:21–35. doi: 10.1086/527269. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

148. Johar G.V., Sengupta J., Aaker J.L. Two roads to updating brand personality impressions: Trait versus evaluative inferencing. J. Mark. Res. 2005;42:458–469. doi: 10.1509/jmkr.2005.42.4.458. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

149. Pratkanis A.R., Greenwald A.G. Recent perspectives on unconscious processing: Still no marketing applications. Psychol. Mark. 1988;5:337. doi: 10.1002/mar.4220050405. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

150. Smeets M., Dijksterhuis G. Smelly primes—When olfactory primes do or do not work. Front. Psychol. 2014;5:96. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00096. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

151. Packard V. The Hidden Persuaders. McKay; New York, NY, USA: 1957. [Google Scholar]

152. Vicary J.M. How psychiatric methods can be applied to market research. Printer’s Ink. 1950;11:39–40. [Google Scholar]

153. Verwijmeren T., Karremans J.C., Bernritter S.F., Stroebe W., Wigboldus D.H.J. Warning: You are being primed! The effect of a warning on the impact of subliminal ads. J. Exp. Soc. Psychpol. 2013;49:1124–1129. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2013.06.010. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

154. Vicary J.M. The circular test of bias in personal interview surveys. Public Opin. Q. 1955;19:215–218. doi: 10.1086/266564. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

155. Key B.W. Subliminal Seduction. Prentice-Hall; Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA: 1973. [Google Scholar]

156. Key B.W. Media Sexploitation. Prentice-Hall; Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA: 1976. [Google Scholar]

157. Thorne S.B., Himelstein P. The role of suggestion in the perception of satanic messages on rock-and-roll recordings. J. Psychol. 1984;116:245–248. doi: 10.1080/00223980.1984.9923643. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

158. Strahan E.J., Spencer S.J., Zanna M.P. Applying Social Cognition to Consumer-Focused Strategy. Psychology Press; Mahwah, NJ, USA: 2005. Subliminal priming and persuasion: How motivation affects the activation of goals and the persuasiveness of messages; pp. 267–280. [Google Scholar]

159. Aarts H., Dijksterhuis A., DeVries P. On the psychology of drinking: Being thirsty and perceptually ready. Br. J. Psychol. 2001;92:631–642. doi: 10.1348/000712601162383. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

160. Strahan E.J., Spencer S.J., Zanna M.P. Subliminal priming and persuasion: Striking while the iron is hot. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 2002;38:556–568. doi: 10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00502-4. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

161. Dijksterhuis A., Aarts H., Smith P.K. In: The Power of the Subliminal: Subliminal Perception and Possible Application. Hassin R., Uleman J., Bargh J.A., editors. Oxford University Press; New York, NY, USA: 2005. pp. 77–106. The New Unconsciousness. [Google Scholar]

162. Pratkanis A.R., Aronson E. Age of Propaganda: The Everyday Use and Abuse of Persuasion. Henry Holt and Company LLC; New York, NY, USA: 2001. [Google Scholar]

163. Greenwald A.G., Spangenberg E.R., Pratkanis A.R., Eskenazy J. Double-blind tests of subliminal self-help audiotapes. Psychol. Sci. 1991;2:119–122. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1991.tb00112.x. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

164. Audley B.C., Mellett J.L., Williams P.M. Self-improvement using subliminal audiotapes: Consumer benewt or consumer fraud?; Presented at the Meeting of the Western Psychological Association; San Francisco, CA, USA. April 1991. [Google Scholar]

165. Merikle P.M., Skanes H.F. Subliminal self-help audiotapes: Search for placebo effects. J. Appl. Psychol. 1992;77:772–776. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.77.5.772. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

166. Brannon L.A., Brock T.C. The Subliminal Persuasion Controversy: Reality, Enduring Fable, and Polonious’ Weasel. In: Shavitt S., Brock T.C., editors. Persuasion: Psychological Insights and Perspectives. Allyn & Bacon; Boston, MA, USA: 1994. [Google Scholar]

167. Baron R.M., Kenny D.A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 1986;51:1173–1182. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

168. Conway M., Ross M. Getting what you want by revising what you had. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 1984;47:738–748. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.47.4.738. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

169. Ross M. Relation of implicit theories to the construction of personal histories. Psychol. Rev. 1989;96:341–357. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.96.2.341. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

170. Ross M., Olson J.M. An expectancy attribution model of the effects of placebos. Psychol. Rev. 1981;88:408–437. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.88.5.408. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

171. Mikulincer M., Shaver P.R. The psychological effects of the contextual activation of security-enhancing mental representations in adulthood. Curr. Opin. Psychol. 2015;1:18–21. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.01.008. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

172. McGuire A., Gillath O., Jackson Y., Ingram R. Attachment Security Priming as a Potential Intervention for Depressive Symptoms. J. Soc. Clin. Psychol. 2018;37:44–68. doi: 10.1521/jscp.2018.37.1.44. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

173. Doche-Budzynski L., Budzynski T.H. Subliminal self-esteem enhancement in adult type a males. Education. 1989;110:50–56. [Google Scholar]

174. Meerman E.E., Verkuil B., Brosschot J.F. Decreasing pain tolerance outside of awareness. J. Psycholo. Res. 2011;70:250–257. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2010.08.006. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

175. Shanks D.R., Newell B.R., Lee E.H., Balakrishnan D., Ekelund L., Cenac Z., Kavvadia F., Moore C. Priming intelligent behavior: An elusive phenomenon. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e56515. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056515. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

176. Gillis R. Ferrari finds smoke without fire. The Wall Street Journal. Mar 26, 2010.

177. Gillis R., Clegg J. Ferrari scraps barcode logo. The Wall Street Journal. May 9, 2010.

178. Weinberger J., Westen D. Rats, we should have used clinton: Subliminal priming in political campaigns. Political Psychol. 2008;29:631–651. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00658.x. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

179. Pratkanis A.R. The cargo-cult science of subliminal persuasion. Skept. Inq. 1992;16:260–272. [Google Scholar]

180. Tsai M.-t., Wen-Ko L., Liu M.-L. The effects of subliminal advertising on consumer attitudes and buying intentions. Int. J. Manag. 2007;24:3. [Google Scholar]

181. Madzharov A.V., Block L.G., Morrin M. The cool scent of power: Effects of ambient scent on consumer preferences and choice behavior. J. Mark. 2015;79:83–96. doi: 10.1509/jm.13.0263. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

What is activation of the receptors by stimuli called?

What is the tendency of sensory receptor cells to become less responsive to a stimulus that is unchanging?

What is the mental process of making meaning of sensory information?

What is the term for perceptual processes occurring below the level of conscious awareness?