What is the difference between an ethnocentric and a polycentric staffing approach?

What is the difference between an ethnocentric and a polycentric staffing approach?

1.
(Chapter 2) What is the difference between a polycentric, ethnocentric, and geocentric approach to international management? What key factors should a firm consider before adopting one of these approaches? Polycentric approach to international management is the policy involved hiring and promoting employees who are citizens of the country that host and operates the company. The polycentric approach is best used in order to maintain low hiring costs. Communication is easier and companies run smoother due to the fact the employees are all related in their geographic location. Ethnocentric approach is a staffing policy that is used in companies that has primarily international strategic orientation. While polycentric maintains employees from the same area, ethnocentric is generally adopted by headquarters by sending employees from the home or parent countries to the host country. Ethnocentric approach is best used when teams from a certain home country are sent to a new location to help direct and assist due to their experience. Geocentric staffing approach is used when companies implement a transnational orientation. In such an approach, rather than maintaining the same groups of people or transferring people, employees are selected regardless where they come from. The geocentric approach recruits the best of the best; this approach is consisting with building a strong unifying management network. A firm should take into consideration one, the immigration policy and whether or not they are able to recruit from certain countries, two, if the area they wish to be located in has workers who are capable for the job. Location and laws are key factors in the approach to international management. http://www.mhhe.com/uop/hill3e/student/olc/ch28s_cs.html http://www.studymode.com/essays/Explain-Each-Of-Ethnocentric-Polycentric-Regiocentric-577450.html

3.(Chapter 3) Contrast common law, civil law, customary law, and theocratic law. Explain their relevance to


You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages

  • Week 5 case team 1 rev 1

    References: Daniels, J., Radebaugh, L., & Sullivan, D. (2014). Globalization and international business. In International business: Environments and operations (Fifteenth ed., p. 7). Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson Education…

    • 1622 Words
    • 5 Pages

  • Culture Impacing Decision Making

    Doh, Jonathan, and Fred Luthans. International Management: Culture, Strategy, and Behavior. 7 ed. New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2008.…

    • 4355 Words
    • 18 Pages

  • You Be the International Consultant

    References: Luthans, F, and Doh, J. P. (2012). International management: Culture, strategy, and behavior (8th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill Irwin. ISBN 978-0-078-11257-7…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages

  • International Business

    “An ethnocentric approach to staffing policy fills all key management positions in an international business with parent-country nationals” (p. 531). The advantages of the ethnocentric approach are: Overcomes lack of qualified managers in host country, unified culture, and helps transfer core competencies. The disadvantages of the ethnocentric approach are: Produces resentment in host country, and can lead to cultural myopia. An ethnocentric approach is typically appropriate for firms utilizing an international strategy. A polycentric staffing policy requires host country nationals to be recruited to manage subsidiaries, while parent country nations occupy key positions at corporate headquarters. The advantages of the polycentric approach are: Alleviates cultural myopia, and it is inexpensive to implement. The disadvantages of the polycentric approach are: Limits career mobility, and isolates headquarters from foreign subsidiaries. “ A polycentric approach is typically appropriate for firms utilizing a multidomestic strategy. A geocentric staffing policy seeks the best people for key jobs throughout the organization, regardless of nationality. The advantages of a geocentric approach are: Uses human resources efficiently, helps build strong culture and informal management network. The disadvantages of the geocentric staffing policy are: National immigration policies may limit implementation, and it is expensive to implement. A geocentric approach is typically appropriate for firms unitizing a global or transnational strategy” (Hill, p.534).…

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages

  • International Mangement

    With Polycentric staffing approachhost country nationals are hired to full key positions in their own country. This approach is more likely to be effective when implementing a multinational strategy. These managers are naturally familiar with the local culture, language and ways of doing business. It is usually less expensive for a company to hire a local than to transfer one from headquarter. HCNs are more likely to be accepted by people both inside and outside the subsidiary. One disadvantage of the polycentric approach is difficulty coordinating activities and goals between the subsidiariesand the parent country, including the potentially conflicting loyalties of the locals.…

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages

  • Ethnocentric Staffing Policies

    The ethnocentric staffing policy refers to the strategy of a multinational company to employ managers for key positions from the parent headquarters instead of employing local staff ("Global Human Resource Management"). Many organizations have traditionally relied on parent country nationals (PCNs) for staffing top management positions abroad for a number of reasons ("Global Human Resource Management"):…

    • 321 Words
    • 2 Pages

  • Perlmutter's Models of Managing Globally

    Ethnocentric subsidiary is managed mainly by home country nationals, with the home country language and culture. Therefore, the recruitment for majority management positions takes place in home country (Muijen et al 2000). For example, the unwritten policy of Ikea is that CEO of any of its overseas units is more likely to be Swedish. In consequences, companies are using home routines and methods to manage its subsidiary, assuming that something that works in their countries must work in anothers (Permutter 1969). This is somehow wrong attitude and this model fail to take under consideration factors present at the foreign markets such as cultural differences, legal issues and marketing differences in terms of customer's preferences (Heer and Noon 2001). However, enthusiast of this approach very often claim that it is difficult to find sufficient managers on the foreign and in consequence less known market. They also stresses that home country exaptriates give the headquarter…

    • 737 Words
    • 3 Pages

  • MULTINATIONAL MANAGEMENT

    Required Text: Fred Luthans, Jonathan P. Doh. 2009. International Management: Culture, Strategy, and Behavior. Seventh Edition. Irwin McGraw-Hill Publishers.…

    • 4418 Words
    • 18 Pages

  • Description

    1. John. D. Daniels, Lee H. Radebaugh, Daniel P. Sullivan. International Business: Environments and Operations. – Pearson, 14th edition, 2013, ISBN 978-0-273-76695-7.…

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages

  • kimaiyo

    This paper will not deal with theoretical examination of differences between the common law and the civil law, but will focus rather on various distinctive features of civil law and common law, with several…

    • 9650 Words
    • 27 Pages

  • Civil Law vs Common Law

    This short essay seeks an answer to the differences between two fundamentally different legal theories or systems. The original difference is that historically, civil law was developed out from the Roman law of Justinian’s Corpus Juris Civilis. Trough the enlightenment, local compilations of legal principles recognized as normative were gathered to create the codification of the Civil law. Whereas, common law was developed by custom. It was applied before any written law and continues to be applied in courts after written law. Therefore, common law is developed by judges, varies from case to case depending upon the customs of the society and the stare decisis. Whereas, in civil law judges have to follow a predefined written set of statutes and codes. However, the codification is by no means a defining characteristic of the civil law system. Indeed the civil law which was originally framed in France is divided in subgroups. For instance, the statutes that govern civil law systems of Nordic countries such as Sweden are not grouped into large codes like those find in Germany or France. [1]…

    • 2200 Words
    • 9 Pages

    • 2889 Words
    • 12 Pages

    • 9919 Words
    • 40 Pages

  • What Are Stereotypes

    M.Hodgetts, R and Luthans, F 2003, International Management: Culture, Strategy and Behaviour, 5th Edition, McGraw Hill…

    • 1247 Words
    • 5 Pages

What is the difference between ethnocentric and polycentric staffing approach?

Ethnocentric approach is used in MNC's having international strategic orientation while polycentric approach maintains employees from the same area, ethnocentric involves sending employees from the home or parent countries to the host country.

What is a polycentric staffing approach?

'Polycentric staffing' is an organizational structure wherein foreign subsidiaries are locally managed by host-country nationals while corporate positions are likewise filled with home-country nationals.

What is ethnocentric approach to staffing?

The ethnocentric approach to recruitment means that we hire people from our parent country to fill positions all over the world. For example, if we want to fill an executive role in a foreign country, we could: Relocate one of our existing employees who's a permanent resident of our parent country.

What is the difference between polycentric and geocentric?

Polycentric Attitude: Polycentric attitude refers to the belief that the best approach of work and practices of business are known by the employees of the host country. Geocentric Attitude: Geocentric attitude refers to a global view that emphasizes the usage of the best approach and people from around the world.