What is the difference between non consequentialist or deontological and consequentialist normative moral theories?

PHIL 240A.� HANDOUT #7.

VARIETIES OF NONCONSEQUENTIALIST ETHICAL THEORIES

��������������� An ANTI-CONSEQUENTIALIST Ethical Theory is a general normative theory of morality according to which the rightness or wrongness of an act, system of rules, etc., in no way depends on the (non-moral) goodness or badness of the consequences.� (e.g., Kant's moral theory is anti-consequentialist)

��������������� A NON-CONSEQUENTIALIST Ethical Theory is a general normative theory of morality that is not Consequentialist--that is, a theory according to which the rightness or wrongness of an act, system of rules, etc. depends, at least in part, on something other than the (non-moral) goodness or badness of the consequences.� Obviously, Anti-Consequentialism implies Non-Consequentialism, but not vice versa.� It is possible for a Non-Consequentialist (e.g., Rawls) to claim that the (non-moral) goodness or badness of the consequences of an act is relevant to moral rightness or wrongness.� A Non-Consequentialist simply claims that (non-moral) goodness or badness of the consequences is not the only thing that determines moral rightness or wrongness.

��������������� A DEONTOLOGICAL Ethical Theory is a duty-based Non-Consequentialist Ethical Theory.� A duty-based theory is a theory according to which the central moral concept is that of duty (i.e., of the rightness or wrongness of individual choices).� A duty-based theory can be contrasted with a sentiment-based or character-based theory (e.g., a Virtue Theory, in which the central moral concept is that of the morally good character or morally good disposition, and which analyzes the rightness or wrongness of individual choices indirectly in terms of the character or dispositions of the agent making the choices).

VARIETIES OF DEONTOLOGICAL ETHICAL THEORIES

(Varieties Correspond to the Four Levels of Moral Disagreement)

��������������� An ACT DEONTOLOGICAL (or PARTICULARIST) Ethical Theory is a deontological theory that accords logical priority to particular moral judgments, rather than to rules or principles.� (All Act Deontological Theories can be summarized as follows:� �Do the right thing!�)

��������������� A RULE DEONTOLOGICAL Ethical Theory (e.g., W.D. Ross) is a deontological theory which accords logical priority to rules (e.g., "Do not lie"), rather than to particular judgments or to principles.� (Ross accords logical priority to the rules stating conditional or prima facie duties.� He does not assume that there are general principles for resolving conflicts among the prima facie duties.)

��������������� A GENERAL-PRINCIPLE DEONTOLOGICAL Ethical Theory is a deontological theory that accords logical priority to general principles (e.g., the Rawlsian principle that one ought to be willing to cooperate on fair terms of social cooperation).

��������������� A BASIC-PRINCIPLE DEONTOLOGICAL Ethical Theory is a deontological theory which claims to derive general principles of morality from the most basic or fundamental normative principles (e.g., Kant's claim to have derived the moral law (the categorical imperative) from the fundamental principles (laws) of rationality�especially, the law of Non-Contradiction).

Published: September 20, 2017

Consequentialism or teleological ethics is based on the premise that the morality of an action is contingent with the outcome of that action. This implies that morally right action produces good outcome and morally wrong produces bad outcome.  The consequences are the effects caused by an action and the quality of these consequences depend on how much good they contain. Motives are the causes and the consequences are the effect. The consequences are defined by various theories such as Utilitarianism (an action is right if it leads to the most happiness for greatest number of people); hedonism {pleasure is the most important pursuit of the humankind so individuals should strive to maximise the total pleasure (net of sufferings and pains)}; egoism (an action is right if it maximises the good for the self. In other words, Egoism gives a license to actions which are good to one individual but may be detrimental to others); asceticism (abstinence from egoistic pleasures to achieve spiritual goals); altruism (to live for others and not caring for self).
The non-consequentialist approach or deontological approach or the duty ethics focuses on the rightness and wrongness of the actions themselves and not the consequences of those actions.  There are several variants of non-consequentialist approach such as Divine Command Theory; Natural Rights Theory etc. Divine Command Theory says that an action is right if it has been sanctioned / decreed by God that it is right. Thus, the moral obligations arise from the command of the God.  Natural Rights Theory, much developed by John Locke and Thomas Hobbe says that absolute and natural rights which are inherent in the nature of ethics and are not contingent upon the human actions. This theory developed into the Human Rights later.

Topics: 095 - Ethics and Human Interface

What are the differences between consequentialist and non

What is the difference between consequentialist and deontological moral theories?

What is a deontological or a non

What is a non