What is it called when there is an emergency and a person is less likely to help because they think there are other people around who will help?

Introduction

Imagine walking back home from a party late one night when you hear a woman screaming for help. You look across the street and notice a man kicking and screaming at the woman lying on the ground. Near the victim are four people watching the attack take place. You decide that one of the bystanders has probably already called the police and you don’t need to do anything further to help the victim. However, no one had yet done anything to help the victim. 

Reason

The reason why there were multiple bystanders but none of them intervened can be attributed to the bystander effect. This effect makes it less likely for people to intervene in emergencies if there are others around them. The more people there are, the more each bystander is discouraged from doing something about the problem. This effect is often the result of the bystander feeling uncertain about their role in the situation. He/she might believe someone else is responsible for seeking help or someone else already did something to help. The bystander might also feel like they are a part of the group and need to do whatever the other bystanders do.

Definition of Bystander Effect

The bystander effect takes place when the presence of others discourages an individual from intervening in an emergency.

Experiment

After the murder of  Kitty Genovese in 1964, social psychologists, John M. Darley and Bibb Latané first became interested in the bystander effect. Kitty’s death received much attention because she was violently stabbed while numerous individual’s stood by, but failed to intervene. 

Darley and Latane first tested and popularized the bystander effect in 1968. The experiment they used to test it has become one of the experiments with the most reliable  results in social psychology. In this experiment, the participant is either alone or among a group of people when an emergency takes place. Psychologists measure how long it takes the participants to intervene- if they do. Latane and Rodin found that 70 percent of the participants called or helped the victim when they were alone. On the other hand, only 40 percent helped when there were others in the room with them-- this is a highly considerable margin!

Why Care?

The bystander effect is an extremely important topic since the wellbeing of others might depend on you. You can utilize this newfound knowledge to help others when they are in need, regardless of what other people around you are doing. It is too often that we look around the room before we act, even if we know and understand that we need to intervene. This knowledge can be your weapon against the belief that others are obligated to do something, when, in fact, you can do something at that moment!

To Get Involved or Not To Get Involved

Have you ever found yourself in a position in which you’ve seen something (like a crime) that shouldn’t take place and you didn’t intervene or do anything about it because you thought that someone else out of the good amount of people who were around you would take action? Has there been an emergency type situation that’s occurred and you didn’t assist because you thought another witness to the situation would handle it first? The textbook talks about the “bystander effect” which is the phenomenon in which “people are less likely to help in an emergency when other bystanders are present” (Gruman, Schneider, Coutts, 2016). This ties into the “diffusion of responsibility”, which refers to an individual’s sense of responsibility being diminished because they have the belief that other people will or should intervene in the situation at hand (Gruman, Schneider, Coutts, 2016).

When the topic of the bystander effect comes up, the murder of a woman named Kitty Genovese is usually connected to the discussion. This tragedy is known to be shown as a huge example of what the bystander effect is. Kitty Genovese was a 28-year-old woman who had come back from work to her home in Queens, New York (History, 2018). As she was across the street from her apartment, a man attacked her with a knife and stabbed her as her neighbors did nothing to help her as she screamed. The man left and as she tried to make it to her front door, the man returned and stabbed her more and raped her as more witnesses watched from afar. The police were eventually called and Kitty ended up dying en route to the hospital. None of the witnesses did anything to stop the man or help Kitty because they all thought that someone else out of the group of witnesses would do something about it. One of the witnesses later claimed that he didn’t want to get involved at the time. It is said that this tragedy that occurred played a role in being one of the factors in which the 911 emergency system was set into place.

There’s a show that I used to watch called “What Would You Do?” that was hosted by a man named John Quinones. The show involved using actors to portray characters to create dilemmas in public places (like parks, restaurants, etc.). Then, with the usage of hidden cameras, John would observe individuals and see what they would do in the midst of that dilemma. He wanted to see if they would take action and do something, or if they wouldn’t do anything about it and keep to themselves. There was an episode where a young teenage girl (an actress) was sitting at a table at a restaurant and a male (also an actor) who is way older than her, approaches her and compliments her. He tells her that he’s a professional photographer and he can take great pictures of her and turn her into a star. At this point you can see people at the tables around this girl eavesdropping on the convo and most look very uncomfortable by this creepy man. People are wide-eyed and look at each other in disbelief that they’re witnessing this and that the teenager seems to believe what the man is saying, especially when he says that he’ll take her back to his place where he shoots the pictures. The man then goes to the bathroom for a second and that’s when John watches for the witnesses to see if they’ll do anything. Some of them actually went to the teenager and told her that she should be careful because the guy might not actually be a photographer and that she shouldn’t go with a stranger to his house. The teenager says things like “oh but it seems like a good opportunity” or something along those lines. Some of the witnesses respond by saying they’re not telling her what to do but are just giving her a heads up that it’s a bad idea. In some scenes, witnesses don’t say anything at all. Eventually when the man comes back, he beckons her to go with him and she proceeds to follow him. This is where John observed the most. Would these people mind their business and risk letting this young girl go with this strange alleged photographer man to his home? Or would they stop it? There were a few people who were so creeped out by what was happening that they followed the two actors outside to confront the man and pull the girl aside and begged her not to go with him. One lady told him to get lost and that she wouldn’t allow the girl to go with him. Soon after, John comes out and reveals that it’s a show and asks witnesses why they reacted the way they did or why they didn’t react.

There was an experiment done where actors were used to conduct a kidnapping in public, to see how people would react. A young girl was “kidnapped” by an older male and she is seen screaming for someone to help her as she says the man isn’t her dad, as he drags her by the arm (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NJKgA9b_5p8). You can see people in the video seeing what’s happening, looking, and walking past. A woman is interviewed and she says that it’s one of those situations where you think that someone else will do something. Then you see three other men who hear the girl’s pleas and run together toward the man to stop the kidnapping. They’re then told that it’s an experiment. One of the men say that his friend wasn’t reacting so he thought not to, especially because he thought maybe the child was just being disobedient but then after constantly hearing the little girl scream, he couldn’t stand by and risk it so him and his friends ran after the guy.

It’s sad that this mentality that “someone else will do something, so I won’t/don’t have to”, exists. Sometimes we may not even realize that we’re doing it when we just make the assumption that other people will do something when a dilemma or emergency situation occurs. This kind of thought process is unfortunate, as people could really be in danger and require any one person’s help. It’s also understandable on the other end that people might be afraid that they’ll put themselves in danger too if they try to help. I recall a story where a woman was on a beach and went out deep into the water. The water came in strong and she was swept out further, unable to come back to shore and was drowning I believe. An individual was a witness to the woman struggling and so they jumped into the water, in an attempt to save her. The woman was saved and brought safely to shore. Months later, she ended up suing the individual who saved her, because she claimed that she had obtained injuries from them saving her. The individual thought that they were doing a good thing by helping the woman but ended up getting sued for doing just that. Situations like this may cause some people to stop themselves from helping. My hope is that one day we can get past this mentality that we don’t have to get involved because we think someone else will.

Works Cited:

Gruman, J. A., Schneider, F. W., & Coutts, L. M. (Eds.). (2016). Applied social psychology : Understanding and addressing social and practical problems. Retrieved from https://ebookcentral.proquest.com

History.com Editors. (2018, January 5). Kitty Genovese. Retrieved from https://www.history.com/topics/crime/kitty-genovese

This entry was posted on Saturday, March 7th, 2020 at 8:08 pm and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any comments to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a comment, or trackback from your own site.

What is the meaning of bystander effect?

bystander effect, the inhibiting influence of the presence of others on a person's willingness to help someone in need. Research has shown that, even in an emergency, a bystander is less likely to extend help when he or she is in the real or imagined presence of others than when he or she is alone.

Why do most people not intervene when there is an emergency?

According to a social psychological phenomenon known as the bystander effect, people do not intervene in emergencies because of a diffusion of responsibility. In fact, likelihood of help is inversely proportional to the number of bystanders (1).

Why are people less likely to act during a conflict when there are others around them?

Understanding the Bystander Effect The perceived diffusion of responsibility means that the more onlookers there are, the less personal responsibility individuals will feel to take action. Social influence means that individuals monitor the behavior of those around them to determine how to act.

What would you do bystander effect?

Have you ever found yourself in a position in which you've seen something (like a crime) that shouldn't take place and you didn't intervene or do anything about it because you thought that someone else out of the good amount of people who were around you would take action?